3D printing of cellulose nanocrystals based composites to build robust biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
Noyes, F. R. Noyes’ Knee Disorders: Surgery, Rehabilitation, Clinical Outcomes E-Book (Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016).
Kanwar, S. & Vijayavenkataraman, S. Bioprinting design of 3D printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: A review. Bioprinting 24, e00167 (2021).
Google Scholar
Krzysztof, P. & Pokrowiecki, R. Porous titanium implants: A review. Adv. Mater. Eng. 20, 1700648 (2018).
Google Scholar
Aro, H. T. & Aho, A. J. The clinical use of bone allografts. Ann. Med. 25, 403–412 (1993).
Google Scholar
Iqbal, N. See et. The most recent concepts in tissue engineering using biodegradable plastics. Int. Mater. Rev. 64, 91–126 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bose, S., Roy, M. & Bandyopadhyay, A. New advances in bone tissue engineering and scaffolds. Trends in Biotechnol 30, 546–554 (2012).
Google Scholar
Porter, J. R., Ruckh, T. T. & Popat, K. C. Bone tissue engineering: A review in bone biomimetics and drug delivery strategies. Biotechnol. Prog. 25, 1539–1560 (2009).
Google Scholar
Obrien F. J. Tissue engineering scaffolds and biomaterials Mater. Today 14, 88–95 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ma, P. X. Scaffolds used for tissue production Mater. Today 7, 30–40 (2004).
Google Scholar
Cheung, H.-Y., Lau, K.-T., Lu, T.-P. & Hui, D. A critical review on polymer-based bio-engineered materials for scaffold development. Compos. Part B Eng. 38, 291–300 (2007).
Google Scholar
Jonoobi, M., Harun, J., Mathew, A. P. & Oksman, K. Mechanical properties of cellulose nanofiber (CNF) reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) prepared by twin screw extrusion. Compos. Sci. Technol. 70, 1742–1747 (2010).
Google Scholar
Patel, D. K., Deb, S., Hexiu, J., Ganguly, K. & Lim, K. Bioactive electrospun nanocomposite scaffolds of poly(lactic acid)/ cellulose nanocrystals for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 162, 1429–1441 (2020).
Google Scholar
Elena, M. See et. Three-dimensional printed polycaprolactone-microcrystalline cellulose scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Res. 107B, 521–528 (2019).
Cakmak, A. M. See et. 3D printed polycaprolactone/gelatin/bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Polymers (Basel). 12, 1962 (2020).
Google Scholar
Meftahi, A. See et. For skincare and cosmetics: Regulations and new applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 278, 118956 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bhattarai, N., Li, Z., Edmondson, D. & Zhang, M. Alginate-based nanofibrous scaffolds: Structural, mechanical, and biological properties. Adv. Mater. 18, 1463–1467 (2006).
Google Scholar
Feng, B., Tu, H., Yuan, H., Peng, H. & Zhang, Y. Acetic-acid-mediated miscibility toward electrospinning homogeneous composite nanofibers of GT/PCL. Biomacromol 13, 3917–3925 (2012).
Google Scholar
Bhattarai, N. See et. For biomedical purposes, natural-synthetic synthetic polyblend nanofibers are available. Adv. Mater. 21, 2792–2797 (2009).
Google Scholar
Pon-on, W., Suntornsaratoon, P. & Charoenphandhu, N. Synthesis and investigations of mineral ions-loaded apatite from fish scale and PLA/chitosan composite for bone scaffolds. Mater. Lett. 221, 143–146 (2018).
Google Scholar
Edwards, A., Jarvis, D., Hopkins, T., Pixley, S. & Bhattarai, N. Poly(ε-caprolactone)/keratin-based composite nanofibers for biomedical applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 103, 21–30 (2015).
Google Scholar
Belaid, H. See et. Boron nitride based nanobiocomposites : design by 3D printing for bone tissue engineering. Acs Appl. Bio Mater. 3, 1865–1875 (2020).
Google Scholar
Soundarya, S. P., Menon, A. H., Chandran, S. V. & Selvamurugan, N. Bone tissue engineering: Scaffold preparation using chitosan and other biomaterials with different design and fabrication techniques. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 119, 1228–1239 (2018).
Google Scholar
Guo, L. See et. Natural polymers and bone tissue engineering: What is their role? J. Control. Control 338, 571–582 (2021).
Google Scholar
Martínez-moreno, D., Jim, G. & Marchal, J. A. A. Mater. Sci. Eng. Eng. 122, 111933 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bobbert, F. S. L. & Zadpoor, A. A. The effects of bone substitute structure and its surface properties on cell responses, angiogenesis and the formation of new bone. Mater. Chem. Chem. 5, 6157–6414 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mirkhalaf, M. See et. 3D-printed scaffolds: Redefining architectural effects through rational design to optimize bone tissue regeneration Appl. Mater. Today 25, 101168 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shirzad, M., Zolfagharian, A., Matbouei, A. & Bodaghi, M. Design, evaluation, and optimization of 3D printed truss scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 120, 104594 (2021).
Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, S. See et. 3D-printed antimicrobial polycaprolactone scaffolds are being made for tissue engineering purposes. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 118, 111525 (2021).
Google Scholar
Belaid, H. See et. New biocompatible, 3D-printed graphene oxide-based scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 110, 110595 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, W. See et. Pla/n-HA composite scaffolds can be 3D printed with custom mechanical and biological properties for bone tissue engineering. Compos. Compos. 224, 109192 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mondal, S., Phuoc, T., Pham, V. H. & Hoang, G. Hydroxyapatite nano bioceramics optimized 3D printed poly lactic acid scaffold for bone tissue engineering application. Ceram. Int. 46, 3443–3455 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, B. See et. Regenerative PLA/HA bone tissue 3D printing scaffolds, with extensive performance optimizations Mater. Des. 201, 109490 (2021).
Google Scholar
Du, J. See et. Comparison of neural differentiation between chitosan and cellulose acetate. Carbohydr. Polym. 99, 483–490 (2014).
Google Scholar
Shi, Q. See et. Osteogenesis using a bacterial cellulose scaffold containing bone morphogenetic proteins-2. Biomaterials 33, 6644–6649 (2012).
Google Scholar
Joseph, B., Sagarika, V. K., Sabu, C., Kalarikkal, N. & Thomas, S. Cellulose nanocomposites: Fabrication and biomedical applications. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 5, 223–237 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lin, N. & Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J. 59, 302–325 (2014).
Google Scholar
Murizan, N. I. S., Mustafa, N. S., Ngadiman, N. H. A., Mohd Yusof, N. & Idris, A. Nanocrystalline cellulose and bone tissue engineering: A review. Polymers (Basel). 12, 2818 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shuai, C., Yuan, X., Yang, W., Peng, S. & Qian, G. Synthesis of a mace-like cellulose nanocrystal @ Ag nanosystem via in-situ growth for antibacterial activities of poly-L-lactide scaffold. Carbohydr. Polym. 262, 117937 (2021).
Google Scholar
He, Y., Li, H., Fei, X. & Peng, L. Carboxymethyl cellulose/cellulose nanocrystals immobilized silver nanoparticles as an effective coating to improve barrier and antibacterial properties of paper for food packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 252, 117156 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kumar, A. See et. The crosslinking of functionality has an effect on microstructure, mechanical property, and in vitro cellocompatibility for cellulose nanocrystals reinforced by poly(vinyl Alcohol)/sodium Alginate hybrid scaffolds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 95, 962–973 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rashtchian, M., Hivechi, A., Bahrami, S. H., Milan, P. B. & Simorgh, S. Fabricating alginate/poly(caprolactone) nano fibers with enhanced bio-mechanical properties via cellulose nanocrystal incorporation. Carbohydr. Polym. 233, 115873 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Madhusudana, K. & Soo, S. Development of sodium alginate-xanthan gum based nanocomposite scaffolds reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals and halloysite nanotubes. Polym. Test. 63, 214–225 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Rao, K. M. & Han, S. S. Mechanically viscoelastic nanoreinforced hybrid hydrogels composed of polyacrylamide, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, graphene oxide, and cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr. Polym. 193, 228–238 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sucinda, E. F. See et. International journal of biologic macromolecules characterisation and development of packaging film using Napier cellulose nanowhisker-reinforced polylactic acid (PLA), bionanocomposites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 187, 43–53 (2021).
Google Scholar
Vorawongsagul, S., Pratumpong, P. & Pechyen, C. Preparation and foaming behavior of poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene succinate)/cellulose fiber composite for hot cups packaging application. Packag for Food The Shelf Life 27, 100608 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ghaffari-bohlouli, P., Jafari, H., Khatibi, A., Bakhtiari, M. & Tavana, B. Osteogenesis enhancement using poly (L-lactide-co-D, L-lactide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) nano fi brous scaffolds reinforced by phospho-calcified cellulose nanowhiskers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 182, 168–178 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cui, L. See et. Regenerated Cellulose/PLA nanocomposites – Rheology: Network formation, modeling Mater. Des. 206, 109774 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chen, J., Zhang, T., Hua, W., Li, P. & Wang, X. The 3D porous polylactic and regenerated cellulose composite scaffolds are based upon electrospun nanofibers that can be used for biomineralization. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 585, 124048 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rajeshkumar, G. See et. Environment friendly, renewable and sustainable poly lactic acid (PLA) based natural fiber reinforced composites—A comprehensive review. J. Clean. Prod. 310, 127483 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mao, D., Li, Q., Bai, N., Dong, H. & Li, D. Porous stable poly(lactic acid)/ethyl cellulose/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds prepared by a combined method for bone regeneration. Carbohydr. Polym. 180, 104–111 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yan, D. See et. For ocular cell proliferation, antimicrobial applications and surface modified electrospun poly (lactic Acid ), a fibrous scaffold with Ag nanoparticles and cellulose nanofibroils. Mater. Sci. Eng. Eng. 111, 110767 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kumar, S. D., Venkadeshwaran, K. & Aravindan, M. K. Fused deposition modelling of PLA reinforced with cellulose nano-crystals. Mater. Today, Proc. 33, 868–875 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. See et. Preparation of 3D printable micro/nanocellulose-polylactic acid (MNC/PLA) composite wire rods with high MNC constitution. Ind. Crop. Prod. 109, 889–896 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Ji, C., Sun, L., Sun, J. & Liu, J. Cellulose nanofibrils filled poly(lactic acid) biocomposite filament for FDM 3D printing. Molecules 25, 2319 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hafizi, W., Ishak, W., Rosli, N. A. & Ahmad, I. The influence of amorphouscellulose on the mechanical, thermological, and hydrolytic degradation of poly(lactic Acid) biocomposites. Sci. Rep. 10, 11342 (2020).
Google Scholar
Murphy, C. A. & Collins, M. N. Microcrystalline cellulose reinforced polylactic acid biocomposite filaments for 3D printing. Polym. Compos. 39, 1311–1320 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nagarajan, S. See et. For bone tissue engineering, design of gelatin/boron nitride nanofibers. ACS Appl. Mater. Mater. 9, 33695–33706 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cataldi, A., Rigotti, D., Nguyen, V. D. H. & Pegoretti, A. Polyvinyl alcohol reinforced with crystalline nanocellulose for 3D printing application. Mater. Today Commun. 15, 236–244 (2018).
Google Scholar
Azarudeen, R. S. See et. 3D printable polycaprolactone-gelatin blends characterized for in vitro osteogenic potency Raja. React. Funct. Polym. 146, 104445 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alam, F., Shukla, V. R., Varadarajan, K. M. & Kumar, S. Microarchitected polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposite scaffolds for biomedical applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 103, 103576 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stoof, D. & Pickering, K. Fused deposition modelling of natural fibre/polylactic acid composites. J. Compos. Sci. 1, 8 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mazzanti, V., Malagutti, L. & Mollica, F. FDM 3D printing of polymers containing natural fillers: A review of their mechanical properties. Polymers (Basel). 11, 1094 (2019).
Google Scholar
Xu, L., Zhao, J., Qian, S., Zhu, X. & Takahashi, J. Green-plasticized poly(lactic acid)/nanofibrillated cellulose biocomposites with high strength, good toughness and excellent heat resistance. Compos. Sci. Technol. 203, 108613 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tarrahi, R. See et. A cellulose-based scaffold is developed for the sustained delivery of curcumin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 183, 132–144 (2021).
Google Scholar
Torgbo, S. & Sukyai, P. Fabrication of microporous bacterial cellulose embedded with magnetite and hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Chem. Phys. 237, 121868 (2019).
Google Scholar
Krieghoff, J. See et. An increase in the pore size of scaffolds can improve coating efficiency and mineralization ability of osteoblasts. Biomater. Res. 23, 23–26 (2019).
Google Scholar
Malliappan, S. P., Yetisgin, A. A., Sahin, S. B., Demir, E. & Cetinel, S. Bone tissue engineering: Anionic polysaccharides as promising scaffolds Ponnurengam. Carbohydr. Polym. 283, 119142 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gorgieva, S., Girandon, L. & Kokol, V. Mineralization potential of cellulose-nano fi brils reinforced gelatine scaffolds for promoted calcium deposition by mesenchymal stem cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 73, 478–489 (2017).
Google Scholar
K. Szustakiewicz Compos. Sci. Technol. 197, 108279 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dridi, A., Zlaoui, K. & Somrani, S. Mechanism of apatite formation on a poorly crystallized calcium phosphate in a simulated body fluid (SBF) at 37 °C. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 156, 110122 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. See et. The mechanical properties and biomineralization multifunctional nanodiamond PLLA composites are important for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33, 5067–5075 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zou, L., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Chen, J. & Zhang, Q. Biomimetic mineralization on natural and synthetic polymers to prepare hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf. Coloids Surf. 178, 222–229 (2019).
Google Scholar
Syahir, M. See et. Proceedings of a possible artificial bone replacement by the entrapment collagen on a polylactic acid 3D scaffold. Mater. Today, Proc. 46, 1668–1673 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, R. & Ma, P. X. Porous poly (L-lactic acid)/apatite composites created by biomimetic process. J. Biomed. Mater. Resour. 45, 285–293 (1999).
Google Scholar
Ngiam, M. See et. The fabrication of nanofibrous mineralized polymeric composites used in bone graft materials Tissue Engineering 15, 535–546 (2009).
Google Scholar
Fragal, E. H. See et. From biomimetic growing of hydroxiapatite onto cellulose nanowhiskers, hybrid materials can be used to engineer bone tissue. Carbohydr. Polym. 152, 734–746 (2016).
Google Scholar
Harris, S. A., Enger, R. J., Riggs, B. L. & Spelsberg, T. C. Development and characterization of a conditionally immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cell line. J. Bone Miner. Res. 10, 178–186 (1995).
Google Scholar
Zheng, D., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y. & Yue, J. The isolation and characterisation of nanocellulose in a unique form from walnutJuglans Regia L.) Shell agricultural waste. Polymers (Basel). 11, 1130 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lee, S. H. & Song, W. S. Modification of polylactic acid fabric by two lipolytic enzyme hydrolysis. Text. Res. J. 83, 229–237 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lee, S. H., Kim, I. Y. & Song, W. S. Biodegradation of polylactic acid (PLA) fibers using different enzymes. Macromol. Res. 22, 657–663 (2014).
Google Scholar
Kokubo, T. & Takadama, H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity ?. Biomaterials 27, 2907–2915 (2006).
Google Scholar